Along with the proposed moratoriums, the California Department of Conservation proposed rules that would require oil and gas companies to reveal the locations of wells being hydraulically fractured and to disclose the chemicals used.
These potential delays and the required disclosures may have energy firms considering whether the Monterey Shale’s resources are worth the wait.
Additional pending legislation includes the following:
- S.B. 395 would classify hydraulic fracturing wastewater as a hazardous substance.
- S.B. 665 would amend bonding requirements for operators of natural gas wells.
- A.B. 7 would require the disclosure of the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, while providing protection for trade secrets.
- A.B. 288 would give the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources 30 days to approve a new drilling permit application, extending the deadline from 10 days.
- A.B. 669 would require the operator to get approval from the regional water quality control board for the method and location of wastewater disposal before starting to drill.
- A.B. 982 would require groundwater monitoring before and after any hydraulic fracturing operation.
This article was prepared by Barclay Nicholson (bnicholson@fulbright.com or 713 651 3662) from Fulbright's Energy Practice Group.